I'm very upset with our side. They are allowing the left to dictate the narrative again! Rather than our side talking about all of the atrocious and harmful mandates, dictates, and taxes on the American people and businesses due to Obamacare every chance they can...they allow themselves to get sucked into numerous other 'side shows' topics put out there by the left, specifically designed to STOP the right from doing as I just said above. They are successfully keeping everyone talking about everything but the 'train wreck' that is heading our way! The Bible says that 'the wicked are wiser than the righteous' and this is a great example of it. They play our side like a fiddle, far too often. Please Republicans! Are you listening! Take EVERY opportunity to educate the American citizens about Obamacare at a time, when they are actually listening! Well, more, anyway.
Only about 15% of our government is actually closed down, at this point. Like Glen Beck has said, recently, what large company couldn't afford to slim down 15% without everything falling apart? Most could, and no doubt, our government could too! Our wasteful government spending is known to all! If you were to take a survey of average American people in any city of any state, I believe that we would get a 100% agreement that our government is wasteful - to scandalous proportions! Yet, President Obama clearly chooses things to refuse to fund, that will clearly cause upset! He promised to have the most transparent administration ever...yeah, right! The only way that he has been 'transparent' has been during the latest 'sequester fiasco' and now, in the 'strategy' that is being implemented during this 'shut down' of the government. Do whatever you have to do to cause pain, frustration, and discomfort to Americans...and blame the Republicans!
This morning someone filling in on the Mike Gallagher Show, opened up the morning conversation with questions about Speaker Boehner! Saying things like, "Is John Boehner 'for real' or 'just sounding strong because he's being forced to?" He was berating a recent commercial that starts with a baby crying, but ends up making fun of John Boehner. Mike's 'fill-in' went on and on about how unfair he thought that the left was being to John and how great he thought that Speaker Boehner is! Of course he wanted to know what the audience thought!
I took out my cell phone and called the number in order to make a comment. I was just outside of my place of business, possibly causing myself to be late for work, should I be aloud to actually make my comment. But I was LIVID! Surprise! I got through and my comment was accepted. I was put on hold. What followed was SO frustrating...as the clock is ticking and I'm getting closer to being late for work, eight, count them EIGHT commercials went by, followed by another caller...I just had to hang up so that I could go into work! Ugggh! How I wanted to share my aggravation with the guest host's topic choice for the show, and for the naivete of my party."
How I wish I could have said this, for all to hear! "Who cares what the left, or even the right is doing or saying about John, for God sake!" Yeah, we've been frustrated with him, but yes, at this point, we're glad that he's found a backbone and is speaking with clarity and strength. However, I can't believe that you do not see the strategy of the left in making this commercial! You've fallen for their trap! Can't anyone see or spell T-R-A-N-S-P-A-R-E-N-C-Y? We are spending precious air time discussing what Obama wants us to talk about, instead of going over all of the enormous harm that Obamacare is causing, and will cause!
EVERY TIME our side gets a microphone in front of their face they should be educating all of America on just what a horror the Obamacare Bill is, the jobs that are already being lost, and worse, the ruin of the 40 hour work week for many! This is what the Union Leaders are complaining about, as they should! We need to continue to explain what Americans can expect, down the road, if it's fully implemented! Insurance companies all going out of business - and only government health care for us all, in time. Obama can be seen and heard on an old video stating that he prefers a ONE PAYER SYSTEM regarding health care! Leftists play chess in getting their policies implemented...a little at a time...do this first, THEN that...make people THINK that we are doing one thing...while all along, we have a whole different goal.
Our side should take as little time on any other topic that may be brought up, as they possibly can. Answer the questions quick - then onto educating Americans about Obamacare. All of America is listening, as are numerous democratic journalists who are actually starting to see the damage that it is going to brought about. Facebook is running a clip about three democrat journalists interviewing Pelosi, where they are actually giving her a hard time!
Last but not least, ImJusSayin! WHY in the heck do WE refer to ObamaCare as "The Affordable Healthcare Act" for God's sake? We should have a really creepy name for it, and be using it ALL THE TIME! It's going to be anything but 'affordable!' It wouldn't be hard to come up with one..."Obama's Unaffordable Health Care Act! There! That wasn't so hard, was it?
My husband just yelled, "Amen to that!"
Well, it may be not so 'creepy' as I might have liked, but it works. If you can you think of one, let us know!
Monday, October 7, 2013
Thursday, October 3, 2013
Put Aside November 19th...to "Descend On Washington!"
I've been waiting for a call for everyone to go to Washington, sooner or later! Well here it is...I'm reposting this article because it's just too good for me to try to 'tell you about it!' Rather that you read it from the horses mouth! There are some large blank spaces so please KEEP SCROLLING DOWN, to make sure that you read it all! I'm going, how 'bout you?
In the wake of bikers roaring through the streets of Washington DC in protest [Sep 11] and a planned shut down of DC by truckers [Oct 11-13], founder of Judicial Watch Larry Klayman has chosen the date of November 19, 2013 for Americans to “descend on Washington, D.C.’, and ‘demand that he leave town and resign from office if he does not want to face prison time’ for pushing ‘his Muslim, socialist, anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, anti-white, pro-illegal immigrant, pro-radical gay and lesbian agenda.’
Klayman is an attorney who has brought numerous cases against Barack Obama concerning his eligibility to hold the office of President of the United States. He has also mused about a military coup to oust Barack Obama following the Egyptian uprising that ousted former Muslim Brotherhood Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi earlier this year.
Larry Klayman claims that Obama, “like Morsi before his downfall,” is “pushing the American people to the limit” and “playing with fire among the military.”
Only time will tell if Klayman gets any momentum, but CA will be doing everything in our power to support the effort.
Obama Impeachment Movement: November 19th, 2013 Larry Klayman’s Call for Americans to ‘Descend on Washington, D.C.’ and Demand ‘He Leave Town and Resign from Office’
October 3, 2013 by Leave a Comment
In the wake of bikers roaring through the streets of Washington DC in protest [Sep 11] and a planned shut down of DC by truckers [Oct 11-13], founder of Judicial Watch Larry Klayman has chosen the date of November 19, 2013 for Americans to “descend on Washington, D.C.’, and ‘demand that he leave town and resign from office if he does not want to face prison time’ for pushing ‘his Muslim, socialist, anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, anti-white, pro-illegal immigrant, pro-radical gay and lesbian agenda.’Klayman is an attorney who has brought numerous cases against Barack Obama concerning his eligibility to hold the office of President of the United States. He has also mused about a military coup to oust Barack Obama following the Egyptian uprising that ousted former Muslim Brotherhood Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi earlier this year.
Larry Klayman claims that Obama, “like Morsi before his downfall,” is “pushing the American people to the limit” and “playing with fire among the military.”
Only time will tell if Klayman gets any momentum, but CA will be doing everything in our power to support the effort.
Renew America reported: Last Wednesday, the great usurper, Barack Hussein Obama, after having been indicted by an Ocala, Florida citizens’ grand jury, was convicted by a people’s court of defrauding the American people and Floridians by proffering them with a fake birth certificate. See www.citizensgrandjury.com. As readers of this column and www.wnd.com know too well, Obama is not a natural born citizen eligible to be president of the United States, as he was not born in this country to two American citizen parents. However, to justify his fraud and his elections to the highest office in the land, and after years of inquiry, in 2011 the Obama White House posted on its website a birth certificate purporting to show him having been born in Hawaii. The problem is however, according to forensic experts, the birth certificate is altered and forged.
The day of reckoning has come. Obama, having failed to plead in response to the indictment that was served upon him, waived his right to a jury trial. Thumbing his nose at We the People, as the citizens’ prosecutor, I appeared before a citizens’ court judge and presented evidence from Cold Case Posse investigator Michael Zullo showing that Obama tricked voters into electing him in 2008 and 2012. As a result, the citizens’ judge found him guilty on two counts of falsifying information to federal and state election officials. He was thus sentenced to the maximum prison term for these offenses of 10 years, and ordered to immediately surrender himself into the custody of the citizens of the United States and Florida.
Of course, Obama will not willingly obey the law of the people. He will attempt to hide behind the iron fences of the White House, perhaps cowering under his desk for fear that the people will rise up and demand his ouster.
On November 19, 2013, a day that will hopefully live on in the history of our once great republic, I call upon millions of Americans who have been appalled and disgusted by Obama’s criminality – his Muslim, socialist, anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, anti-white, pro-illegal immigrant, pro-radical gay and lesbian agenda – among other outrages, to descend on Washington, D.C., en masse, and demand that he leave town and resign from office if he does not want to face prison time.
I further propose that we borrow the techniques perfected and used by such epic crusaders such as Mahatma Gandhi, to show Obama and his enablers that the American people are more than fed up and will not take it any more. The millions who are being summoned to our nation’s capital should, like Gandhi did in India and South Africa, peacefully shut the city down, by blocking roads and massing in front of the White House chanting for Obama to get out of our nation’s capital. In addition, I propose bringing the victims of his reign of terror to a podium across from the White House in Lafayette Park to give their testimony on how he has singularly severely harmed and in some instances even killed their loved ones through his actions.
In the words of Thomas Paine in the days leading up to the first American Revolution, “these are the times that try men’s souls.” The nation under Obama and even his inert and castrated political opponents, the Republican Party, have driven our country into the bowels of impending doom. The moral and ethical fabric, our economic underpinnings, and our national confidence and prestige are in the tank. Russia has become the leading world power, however evil and compromised under its communist KGB leader Vladimir Putin. The United States is a mere shell of its prior self under real modern leaders like Presidents John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan, to name just a few.
We must act now. Our Founding Fathers pledged their sacred honor, fortunes, and lives to form a new nation under God. They knew that the odds of defeating the British were not great, save for His Divine grace and intervention. Now, 237 years after they signed the Declaration of Independence in my native city of Philadelphia, the nation has come full circle to the tyranny that has been imposed by a new despot, one far more evil than King George III. King George III may have been a greedy “control freak,” but at least he was a Christian. The United States is being run by a Muslim bent on furthering an Islamic caliphate who seeks to destroy our spirituality and the body politic of our Judeo-Christian roots.
Life is not easy. It requires risk and sacrifice. If as a nation we want to restore our freedom, and we are on the verge of being enslaved under Obama’s socialist Muslim inclinations, we must take our fight to a new level. Tea partiers, bikers, construction workers, police officers, school teachers, farmers, truckers, clergy, housewives, husbands, students, doctors, lawyers and all elements of our society who see our nation slipping away into the abyss, must now stand tall and descend on the capital, much like the Egyptians recently did in ousting another radical Muslim, their then president Mohammed Morsi. If the Egyptians can seek to rid their country of the poison of the Muslim Brotherhood without any real history of democracy, then we Americans, who know what democracy is and have practiced it prior to the ascension of the great usurper, can and must succeed.
Obama has now been convicted of having defrauded the American people into electing him as president. Even more so than Nixon during Watergate, he has no legitimacy to remain president and must be forced to resign. If We the People do not demand justice and remove him from office, then we will be furthering his fraud and we will have no one but ourselves to blame for the death of the greatest nation ever to have been on this earth.
In the words of one of our great Founding Fathers and an architect of our Constitution, “we must, indeed, all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.” Benjamin Franklin walked the walk along with the likes of George Washington, John Adams, and Thomas Jefferson. Let us now walk in their footsteps and march into to Washington, D.C., this November 19th, and rid the nation of the criminal who lurks in our White House. Let us send a message to the other corrupt government officials of all political persuasions, that this is our nation, not theirs. Let’s “Occupy Washington” and restore freedom to our shores!
Wednesday, September 4, 2013
Obama and Syria? Frankly, It's a Matter of A Lack Of Trust
Don't know who originally wrote this, but it's good!
Dear Mr. Obama,
You want us to support you in a limited attack on Syria for the use of Chemical Weapons. You state that you have "solid" evidence to support the fact that it was Assad that had used them...
Fine. You want us to TRUST you? Here is what we suggest...
1. Release ALL the documents on Benghazi, pull the gag orders on all involved and de-classify all information.
2. Release ALL the documents that concern Fast and Furious.
3. Release ALL the documents that concern the IRS scandal; force Lois Lerner and the other people that plead the 5th to testify to the American People in a court of LAW.
4. Abolish the IRS and institute a flat tax
5. Tell us why DHS need 1.8 billion rounds of ammunition.
6. Explain to a court of law how it is possible for Eric Holder to investigate Eric Holder and that not be in a "conflict of interest"
7. Tell us exactly how many judges Eric Holder had to go through to get one to approve his targeting of James Rosen.
8. Tell us more about the Pigford Scandal and why black farmers are more important than any other color of farmer
9. Explain this and tell us why she isnt fired...
Sebelius violates the Hatch Act: A U.S. special counsel determined that Sebelius violated the Hatch Act when she made “extemporaneous partisan remarks” during a speech in her official capacity last year. During the remarks, Sebelius called for the election of the Democratic candidate for governor of North Carolina.
10. Tell us how you don't feel responsible for the deaths of Seal Team 6, when you used them for political gain
I could go on, but, you already know all the things you have done wrong and have KNOWN about it.
THEN, we will "listen" to what you have to say about Syria, because frankly, we do not believe ANYTHING you or your administration tell us, and you wonder why.
Sincerely,
The American People
Dear Mr. Obama,
You want us to support you in a limited attack on Syria for the use of Chemical Weapons. You state that you have "solid" evidence to support the fact that it was Assad that had used them...
Fine. You want us to TRUST you? Here is what we suggest...
1. Release ALL the documents on Benghazi, pull the gag orders on all involved and de-classify all information.
2. Release ALL the documents that concern Fast and Furious.
3. Release ALL the documents that concern the IRS scandal; force Lois Lerner and the other people that plead the 5th to testify to the American People in a court of LAW.
4. Abolish the IRS and institute a flat tax
5. Tell us why DHS need 1.8 billion rounds of ammunition.
6. Explain to a court of law how it is possible for Eric Holder to investigate Eric Holder and that not be in a "conflict of interest"
7. Tell us exactly how many judges Eric Holder had to go through to get one to approve his targeting of James Rosen.
8. Tell us more about the Pigford Scandal and why black farmers are more important than any other color of farmer
9. Explain this and tell us why she isnt fired...
Sebelius violates the Hatch Act: A U.S. special counsel determined that Sebelius violated the Hatch Act when she made “extemporaneous partisan remarks” during a speech in her official capacity last year. During the remarks, Sebelius called for the election of the Democratic candidate for governor of North Carolina.
10. Tell us how you don't feel responsible for the deaths of Seal Team 6, when you used them for political gain
I could go on, but, you already know all the things you have done wrong and have KNOWN about it.
THEN, we will "listen" to what you have to say about Syria, because frankly, we do not believe ANYTHING you or your administration tell us, and you wonder why.
Sincerely,
The American People
Tuesday, August 20, 2013
Who's Side is President Obama REALLY On In The Egypt Uprising?
On June 24th, 2013, in Cairo Egypt, after the now infamous 'Arab Spring' and subsequent election, Mohammed Morsi was announced as Egypt's fifth president. Many believe that the Muslim Brotherhood, who Morsi represented, actually took it over and that it originally began with Arabs who were desirous of a more democratic government to lead them. Once Morsi became President of Egypt, he and our President became very buddy-buddy. President Obama didn't seem to be bothered by the fact that the Muslim Brotherhood is a very radical Islamist group who believe in carrying out a 'Holy War' on all 'infidels'...and in time, if /when their true goals were realized...the whole world would be living under Sharia law, and their religious dictatorship!
Conservatives everywhere, rose up on t.v. and radio, and began posting on all social media sights, their complaints about President Obama's decision to send over a billion dollars, and all sorts of major military hardware to Egypt while under Morsi's rule. Behavior like that has been very hard for many patriot minded citizens to get their brains around! Egypt had clearly changed from a leadership who had been at peace with Israel, to one that didn't believe in her right to exist, and President Obama didn't seem to realize this at all...or worse, he did - and for whatever reason, was supportive of it!
Now, we are all watching a second uprising of Egyptian citizens in Cairo, against Mohammed Morsi, and the Muslim Brotherhood...one that has gained the support of Egypt's military. They have removed Morsi from his Presidential position and have him under lock and key! The radical Muslim Brotherhood side of the country, has also risen up, in retaliation, desiring to hold their control over Egypt, which has caused many concerns about it becoming a civil war!
Who's side of this showdown is President Obama really on? The statements that Obama has made regarding this latest uprising in Egypt have been like 'peas under my mattress' so to speak...they've really been bugging me!
First, he lectured the military that they should respect all Egypt's citizen's rights to assemble and to participate in peaceful protest...(yeah right, while they were burning government buildings, and Christian churches and killing people. These are all peaceful protest activities!) In saying this, he was stepping in to help out Morsi and his crowd, since the military had been getting rough with them...and who knew, maybe Morsi's bunch could regain control, beat the others back, and win again! Him and Morsi could continue where they had left off, in their friendship and with all their grandiose plans...(whatever they may have been...)
Secondly, he said that he expected the military to "do as they said that they would do, and bring about a peaceful transition into a democratic-style government." Wait a minute! I'm shaking my head here...this begs a very important question, that I think has been sorely overlooked: If you're saying that you want Egypt's military to do this...why didn't you also communicate this expectation with Morsi as well?
Does President Obama actually think that we believed that his buddy, Mohammed Morsi and his followers were attempting to "peacefully transition Egypt into a democratic country?" I think that the evidence shows clearly, as we look back, that Morsi was not attempting to move Egypt in this way at all! Nor was there any evidence that Obama was 'guiding' Morsi in the democratic ways of the West! Rather, it seemed that Obama invited as much counsel from them into the policies of our country, while Obama was mainly seeing to it that Morsi's military would be beefed up and give them over a billion dollars to boot!
Morsi, his administration, and supporters have shown the citizens of Egypt what they are all about, and it only took a year for them to see where they were taking their country! It looks pretty obvious to anyone with half an eye on this crisis, that the citizens of Egypt found their newly elected President and his administration totally unacceptable to them! Morsi and all his dictatorial plans for Egypt have been booted out by the millions of citizens with the help and support of the military! If he have been in the process of transitioning Egypt into a 'more democratic/western style government, and society' Mohammed Morsi would still be in office instead of being held against his will at this moment...yet our 'dearly beloved' President Obama was supporting him, 100%! What was wrong with that picture?
The third way I heard him address the crisis in Egypt, was likening it to our American Revolution! He explained it as a "process that didn't run smoothly...that there will be 'false starts'...it's a difficult dance."
I think that President Obama can see that the Muslim Brotherhood Egyptians are not winning this battle, and he knows that they won't for sure if he continues to send financial support to Egypt's military. Hmmm...what to do? What must Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood be thinking of Obama at this point? The world is watching, what he will he do...will he show his hand, answering the questions that have interrupted my sleep? What type of government structure does he 'really' support, and want to see running the Arab world...and influencing ours? How will he play his hand? Most likely, he will back out and 'lead from behind'...as he has done before...which is not leading at all. It seems that Obama either does nothing, in these ways, or he's out there shocking the socks off of us all, like when he sent fighter jets to a radical Islamist leader, to (at some point) use against our greatest ally, Israel! What a political roller coaster we ride!
Morsi was well known for his anti-Semitic statements, such as referring to the Jews as descendants of monkeys, and pigs! Israel and America have been strong allies since they became a state in 1948...yet there was our President, rubbing shoulders with those who would seek their demise? The camp David Peace Accord between Egypt and Israel must be upheld. The Brotherhood will not be about doing this. The Muslim Brotherhood is an armed militia. It is a state within a state according to John Bolton former U.S. ambassador to the UN. He believes that the Muslim Brotherhood wants this fight with the military leadership. It will create many more martyrs for their movement, which always creates more rage and a commitment to avenge them, encouraging them to fight, all the more!
Another problem that I am having with all of this...is the hypocrisy I am sensing from our President. I think he speak with forked tongue. Whenever people protest against their governments, in other countries...(even when they get very violent!)...he always goes on and on about that government's responsibility to respect their rights to freely assemble, freedom of speech and to peaceful protest, but when conservatives, in our country attempt to 'freely assemble' and express their free speech and peaceful protesting rights...there is nothing but false accusations hurled at them and about them...they're haters, racists, and any other accusation that can turn people against them. I can just imagine what he would order our military to do, if our Constitution loving militias rose up on the lawn of the White House and insisted on him leaving! So much for anyone's freedom or rights...it would be more like "Hello, drone strikes!"
We need to pray that the more peaceful, democratic side WINS in Egypt...its that simple...and that those who expect to lead by dictatorship, do not! However that happens, it happens. It will be in the best interest of the whole Arab world, America, and for Israel too. Pat Buchanan says that we cannot support the Muslim Brotherhood...even though he is not 100% sure that the military is a fully pro-democratic force. 50% of Egyptians (supposedly) voted for Morsi...though at this point they are obviously regretting that, and are through with him! Who can blame them? This time around Pat believes that we should put our bets on the military. I have to say, at this point, I think so to.
Now, we are all watching a second uprising of Egyptian citizens in Cairo, against Mohammed Morsi, and the Muslim Brotherhood...one that has gained the support of Egypt's military. They have removed Morsi from his Presidential position and have him under lock and key! The radical Muslim Brotherhood side of the country, has also risen up, in retaliation, desiring to hold their control over Egypt, which has caused many concerns about it becoming a civil war!
Who's side of this showdown is President Obama really on? The statements that Obama has made regarding this latest uprising in Egypt have been like 'peas under my mattress' so to speak...they've really been bugging me!
First, he lectured the military that they should respect all Egypt's citizen's rights to assemble and to participate in peaceful protest...(yeah right, while they were burning government buildings, and Christian churches and killing people. These are all peaceful protest activities!) In saying this, he was stepping in to help out Morsi and his crowd, since the military had been getting rough with them...and who knew, maybe Morsi's bunch could regain control, beat the others back, and win again! Him and Morsi could continue where they had left off, in their friendship and with all their grandiose plans...(whatever they may have been...)
Secondly, he said that he expected the military to "do as they said that they would do, and bring about a peaceful transition into a democratic-style government." Wait a minute! I'm shaking my head here...this begs a very important question, that I think has been sorely overlooked: If you're saying that you want Egypt's military to do this...why didn't you also communicate this expectation with Morsi as well?
Does President Obama actually think that we believed that his buddy, Mohammed Morsi and his followers were attempting to "peacefully transition Egypt into a democratic country?" I think that the evidence shows clearly, as we look back, that Morsi was not attempting to move Egypt in this way at all! Nor was there any evidence that Obama was 'guiding' Morsi in the democratic ways of the West! Rather, it seemed that Obama invited as much counsel from them into the policies of our country, while Obama was mainly seeing to it that Morsi's military would be beefed up and give them over a billion dollars to boot!
Morsi, his administration, and supporters have shown the citizens of Egypt what they are all about, and it only took a year for them to see where they were taking their country! It looks pretty obvious to anyone with half an eye on this crisis, that the citizens of Egypt found their newly elected President and his administration totally unacceptable to them! Morsi and all his dictatorial plans for Egypt have been booted out by the millions of citizens with the help and support of the military! If he have been in the process of transitioning Egypt into a 'more democratic/western style government, and society' Mohammed Morsi would still be in office instead of being held against his will at this moment...yet our 'dearly beloved' President Obama was supporting him, 100%! What was wrong with that picture?
The third way I heard him address the crisis in Egypt, was likening it to our American Revolution! He explained it as a "process that didn't run smoothly...that there will be 'false starts'...it's a difficult dance."
In likening the uprising and subsequent violence, etc. to a revolution: it would seem that he might be acknowledging the rights of what seems to be, the more westernized, peaceful Arabs, attempting to break free from the domination of the radical Muslim Brotherhood and rooting for them? Or is he still privately rooting for his buddy Morsi and his radical Islamist supporters? Is it their side that he is speaking of when he says, "there will be false starts?" Does he see THEM as the true 'freedom fighters' with rights to set up their society in the way that they have decided that it should be - forcing everyone else to comply? I wish I didn't have to ask this, but after all of his previous behaviors and decisions concerning Morsi and his friends in the not so distant past, it begs these questions!
Hey, ImJusSayin! Which side is he (really) rooting for? That's the most important question to America. How is our leader, thinking? What does he truly believe in?
Obviously, we can all see, that Egypt's citizens are fighting for their lives, and for their rights to live as they choose. One side wants to live under Sharia law, and the other does not. One wants to modernize their economy and society, and the other does not. Those wanting a more westernized culture, without Morsi's dictatorial administration oppressing them and their families seem to be winning at this point. They are fighting for their freedom with the help of the military - from those who were Obama's friends, just a few weeks ago! (Against the many complaints and better judgement of so many Americans!)
I think that the answers to these questions are pretty important, and we shouldn't be letting Obama slip away, unsinged by his past relationship with, and support of Morsi! Nor should we ASSUME that he is on the side of the more western thinking Egyptians just because he starts using verbage from our constitution in his speeches, now! I am not so impressed with what this President says, I am more interested in what I see him doing.
Americans on the right have known all along that Morsi was no democratic leader, and that he was up to no good. They have all been beside themselves, watching Obama, seemingly glued to Morsi's hip! Obama's supporters and the liberal media don't seem to care what the heck is going on, as long as they can stay glued to Obama's hip! They are far more concerned about not having their access to the White House denied, or not being invited to their high class parties. The real duties of a journalist are to report (not spin) the news, to expose disingenuous leaders, and to uncover corruption! This just isn't being done anymore on the left. Instead, they cover up for those guilty of these things.
These are the times that not only 'try men's souls'...but they can actually REVEAL men's souls. Obama and Morsi are both for BIG GOVERNMENT, but he has to sound like he's 'for the people' breaking free from it? What a tight rope Obama must walk...he'll eventually be giving speeches that sound as if he was rooting for the rights of Egypt's citizens to have thrown off an oppressive government, all along...even after he'd been chumming it up with their oppressors? I can just imagine a Saturday Night live 'journalist' pummeling an actor who looks like Jay Carney, or Josh Ernst, W.H. Deputy Press Secretary with sarcastic and embarrassing (but hysterical) questions about Obama's glaring inconsistencies, and his questionable friendship with Egypt's previous President whose oppressive ways caused another major uprising of it's citizens...the only thing Jay can think to do is timidly state that humorous word: "AWKWARD!" You have to admit this whole situation is rather awkward for our President, though I haven't heard ANYONE even addressing it (yet) which I'm sure he's appreciating very much.
If all of us peons out here knew that having the Muslim Brotherhood in charge of Egypt wasn't good for Egypt, Israel, or for America...then I find it hard to believe that Obama didn't see the handwriting on the wall there too...was he just cow-towing to them out of fear, (this could actually be an option here)...or does he indeed have a preference, a natural 'bent' if you will, towards the dictatorial, radical, Islamist ways? This seems to be the nagging conclusion that many of his more 'liberty loving' opponents are coming to.Hey, ImJusSayin! Which side is he (really) rooting for? That's the most important question to America. How is our leader, thinking? What does he truly believe in?
Obviously, we can all see, that Egypt's citizens are fighting for their lives, and for their rights to live as they choose. One side wants to live under Sharia law, and the other does not. One wants to modernize their economy and society, and the other does not. Those wanting a more westernized culture, without Morsi's dictatorial administration oppressing them and their families seem to be winning at this point. They are fighting for their freedom with the help of the military - from those who were Obama's friends, just a few weeks ago! (Against the many complaints and better judgement of so many Americans!)
I think that the answers to these questions are pretty important, and we shouldn't be letting Obama slip away, unsinged by his past relationship with, and support of Morsi! Nor should we ASSUME that he is on the side of the more western thinking Egyptians just because he starts using verbage from our constitution in his speeches, now! I am not so impressed with what this President says, I am more interested in what I see him doing.
Americans on the right have known all along that Morsi was no democratic leader, and that he was up to no good. They have all been beside themselves, watching Obama, seemingly glued to Morsi's hip! Obama's supporters and the liberal media don't seem to care what the heck is going on, as long as they can stay glued to Obama's hip! They are far more concerned about not having their access to the White House denied, or not being invited to their high class parties. The real duties of a journalist are to report (not spin) the news, to expose disingenuous leaders, and to uncover corruption! This just isn't being done anymore on the left. Instead, they cover up for those guilty of these things.
I think that President Obama can see that the Muslim Brotherhood Egyptians are not winning this battle, and he knows that they won't for sure if he continues to send financial support to Egypt's military. Hmmm...what to do? What must Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood be thinking of Obama at this point? The world is watching, what he will he do...will he show his hand, answering the questions that have interrupted my sleep? What type of government structure does he 'really' support, and want to see running the Arab world...and influencing ours? How will he play his hand? Most likely, he will back out and 'lead from behind'...as he has done before...which is not leading at all. It seems that Obama either does nothing, in these ways, or he's out there shocking the socks off of us all, like when he sent fighter jets to a radical Islamist leader, to (at some point) use against our greatest ally, Israel! What a political roller coaster we ride!
Another problem that I am having with all of this...is the hypocrisy I am sensing from our President. I think he speak with forked tongue. Whenever people protest against their governments, in other countries...(even when they get very violent!)...he always goes on and on about that government's responsibility to respect their rights to freely assemble, freedom of speech and to peaceful protest, but when conservatives, in our country attempt to 'freely assemble' and express their free speech and peaceful protesting rights...there is nothing but false accusations hurled at them and about them...they're haters, racists, and any other accusation that can turn people against them. I can just imagine what he would order our military to do, if our Constitution loving militias rose up on the lawn of the White House and insisted on him leaving! So much for anyone's freedom or rights...it would be more like "Hello, drone strikes!"
I'll wrap up with this thought:
We need to pray that the more peaceful, democratic side WINS in Egypt...its that simple...and that those who expect to lead by dictatorship, do not! However that happens, it happens. It will be in the best interest of the whole Arab world, America, and for Israel too. Pat Buchanan says that we cannot support the Muslim Brotherhood...even though he is not 100% sure that the military is a fully pro-democratic force. 50% of Egyptians (supposedly) voted for Morsi...though at this point they are obviously regretting that, and are through with him! Who can blame them? This time around Pat believes that we should put our bets on the military. I have to say, at this point, I think so to.
Friday, July 26, 2013
A Few Thoughts About Anthony Weiner's Insistence on Becoming the Mayor of New York!
Imagine if we didn't live in the high tech, computerized world that we do now...would Mr. "Danger" have told his wife Huma, that he was running out to the store for ice cream or whatever he could think up, and actually end up taking late night walks in the park to open his coat and reveal himself to unsuspecting young ladies?
Long ago, you could call someone and make crank calls...there wasn't anyway for people to know who it was...if Anthony was living in those 'good ol' days'...would he be looking up single ladies names in the telephone book to call them, and shock the bejeebers out of them with filthy sex talk when they picked up the receiver?
If you had a daughter, (or a niece), who was going through an immoral time in her life, not showing the discretion that you would hope...and you find out that your married mayor was sending pictures of his privates to her...and that they were 'sex-ting' messages back and forth? Would you be able to take this man serious, ever again - as the leader of your state...or just as a man, for that matter?
I for one, do NOT think that the people of New York, or any city should ever knowingly vote a person into office who has already proven himself, or herself, to be sexually deviant. I realize that there may be many who disagree that this type of activity is even wrong, but remember, Anthony and his wife have made it very clear that he has received much counseling over the past year, and that he has been working very hard to stop, and have apologized twice! This behavior says loud and clear that they know that this behavior is abnormal and undesirable, especially in the life of a leader. However, now we find out that 'Carlos Danger' continued to be alive and well, his promises of change were just lies.
By the time a person goes through the stages of feeding his own sexual appetites privately, to crossing over those invisible boundary lines - into deviancy, then actually putting it all out there for others to see and hear...that person is no longer capable of sound judgement anymore! By engaging young women that he didn't even know, he has proven that his compulsive behavior was way out of control!
ImJusSayin - Anthony Weiner, admitted to his last young phone and sexting girlfriend, that he was an, "argumentative, perpetually horny, middle aged man!" Imagine he is voted in as Mayor...how could any woman work with him, and not be uncomfortable in his presence? This man would clearly be vulnerable to blackmail besides! Give me a break!
And last, but not least...I have always thought that the fact that the sex slave industry has gotten SO large that it is even referred to as 'an industry' could never have happened unless there were many, many very liberal, extremely deviant people in positions of power who are complicit in many different ways - from looking the other way, to being paid to be quiet, to actually participating in it, in some way. We MUST insist that only people of high character hold positions of power in our cities, states, and in our federal government as well.
ImJusSayin - there are victims of sex slavery, right now, praying for deliverance from their captors...women and children who have been abducted. They, their families, and thousands of others who care passionately about this issue... praying for break-throughs and trusting that the people running our cities, our states, our country - will make decisions that will make a difference for them! And those who are free? They vote in sexual deviants, (like Weiner), who, no doubt, feed their addictions at the hog trough of pornography, where you will find thousands of sex slave victims! If you don't know the first thing about appropriate boundaries in your own life, you shouldn't be forcing yourself into ours by running for Mayor, or for ANY elected position. This is simply disgusting!
Thank God for Bill O'Reilly. He loves to expose Judges who just slap the hands of pedophiles...which is just another twisted way that the sexually deviant 'act out.' Yes, being a pedophile is one way that a person acts out, but I believe that being a judge that will just give them a hand slap, and let them out to strike again, is most likely, either being paid off, or has sexually deviant ways, himself! It's time to insist on high morals for all of our elected officials, and I mean that...regardless of what letter comes after their name!
Some say that the leaders we vote in reflect ourselves...sort of a temperature gauge of our own moral standing. If this is true, and to tell you the truth, it's sure beginning to look like this is what our post modern culture is coming to...all I can say is: "Come, Lord Jesus!"
Saturday, July 20, 2013
The Marriage Myth - Only As Fulfilling As What You Put Into It
The Marriage Box
Most people get married believing a myth;
that marriage is a beautiful box
full of all the things
they have longed for;
companionship, romance, sexual fulfillment,
intimacy, friendship, laughter, financial security.
The truth is that marriage,
at the start, is an empty box.
You must put some things into it
before you can take anything out of it.
There is no love in marriage;
love is in people,
and people put it into their marriage.
There is no romance in marriage;
people have to put it into their relationship.
A couple must discern what things work
to improve their relationship and form
the habits of communicating,
giving, sacrificing, sharing, loving, touching,
serving and praising.
In other words,
keeping the box full.
If you take out more that you put in,
the box will be empty!
~author unknown~
Most people get married believing a myth;
that marriage is a beautiful box
full of all the things
they have longed for;
companionship, romance, sexual fulfillment,
intimacy, friendship, laughter, financial security.
The truth is that marriage,
at the start, is an empty box.
You must put some things into it
before you can take anything out of it.
There is no love in marriage;
love is in people,
and people put it into their marriage.
There is no romance in marriage;
people have to put it into their relationship.
A couple must discern what things work
to improve their relationship and form
the habits of communicating,
giving, sacrificing, sharing, loving, touching,
serving and praising.
In other words,
keeping the box full.
If you take out more that you put in,
the box will be empty!
~author unknown~
Saturday, July 13, 2013
Awaiting The Jurys Verdict On George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin Case
Okay, many are stating these days that, "bloggers aren't real journalists," well...many may not be, but then again some actually are! Reading the varied array of bloggers today, can be better than reading the 'Kool-Aid' drinking journalists of today, who aren't even doing the job that their 'title' would lead you to believe that they would be doing. Many today, are tainted by political correctness, fear of falling out of the good graces of their 'leftist leaders' and running with the 'pack mentality' rather than thinking on their own, and risking opposition. These days there are multiple thousands of blogger commentators, such as myself, weighing in on trending social and political topics of the day, and this one is no different, so here goes:
Give me a break! Everybody keeps saying, "If George Zimmerman would have just listened to the dispatcher and gotten back into his car, none of this would ever have happened!" Well, I'd like to suggest this: "If Trayvon had of just quickly headed home, instead of hanging around, addressing "Z" with his 'attitude' then 'colcocking' him (breaking his nose) and then jumping on him, repeatedly smashing his head into the concrete, followed by his threat that "you're gonna die tonight," then he would most likely be alive today, and none of it would have happened...either!
Yes, both men were making decisions in this case...and yes, I did say "both men." Whenever I speak of a male person about 17 years old, I always refer to him as a "young MAN..." and that is what they prefer to being called...not a "child." Although the pictures that are repeatedly shown of Trayvon have him looking like an innocent young boy, he had grown up quite a bit since then, and had been making decisions in his life, at the time of this incident, that were far from innocent or admirable. Trouble in school and smoking marijuana were two of them, that have been cited. Marijuana may not cause you to become violent, but it can definitely cause you to become very 'phobic' and distort your judgment, for sure!
George Zimmerman, and those who lived in this community were obviously very tired of the fact that this area had been being targeted for B & E's for some time, and according to the reports, even after as many as 40 calls to the local police, they weren't getting much help stopping it. Slow responses were allowing suspicious individuals to go unaddressed by authorities. I heard a report on the radio the other day, of a story of a young woman, in that neighborhood, and her young child. Her home was broken into, and she ended up hiding in a small closet with only a pair of scissors for protection, had she been found! Their fears and frustrations in regards to their safety, around there, were not unfounded!
George Zimmerman showed a lot of courage being willing to be the leader of this neighborhood watch group. I'm sure that the other neighbors were glad that he had been willing to take on this role. I for one, don't appreciate everyone in the media making him out to be a "wanna-be cop" just because he cared about the safety of his neighbors, and he had gone through the required classes to be able to lawfully 'conceal and carry' a gun. If you were going to take this role, and you knew that you could, very likely, be dealing with characters who didn't have respect for people, proven by stealing from them, and worse...you wouldn't want to head out to possibly have to address any of them, unarmed. If you did, you would be a fool!
I've watched stories on the news about Neighborhood Watch Groups being started up in some of the more high crime black communities, and they always portrayed the leaders of them in positive ways, not negative...so why should George Zimmerman be treated as if he is some nasty, racist, just because he wants a safe place to live for his family and neighbors?
I've watched stories on the news about Neighborhood Watch Groups being started up in some of the more high crime black communities, and they always portrayed the leaders of them in positive ways, not negative...so why should George Zimmerman be treated as if he is some nasty, racist, just because he wants a safe place to live for his family and neighbors?
In another vein, the fact that George had gone through the requirements to 'conceal and carry' is another, sorley overlooked reason, (in my opinion,) as to why there has been such a huge political involvement in this case...i.e. our justice department, headed by Eric Holder, (using our tax dollars) to fund opposition to and protests against George Zimmerman not having been arrested in the first place. There were 'racial profiling' reasons, in their minds, no doubt, but they also saw an opportunity to make an example of him to all those other 'law abiding' Americans in our country, who 'conceal and carry' themselves. What a great way to cause them to all becoming deathly afraid to use their weapons to protect themselves and others, should such a situation arise!
ImJusSayin' these are just some of the thoughts that have been going through my mind, and I feel confident to say, in many others, too. Finding out that George was a blend of both Jewish and Mexican and also tutored African American students of his own volition put to rest any accusations of him being a racist in my mind. Jews are a race and culture unto themselves, and are not considered 'white.' They understand the pain of 'racism' in very unique ways, themselves...and who would argue that Mexicans don't experience marginalization, and racism as well? In the very beginning, when every liberal black leader was out there demanding that this was a white on black, 'racial crime,' and that, George Zimmerman had "hunted Trayvon down like a dog" (for one,) I remember thinking that making this claim so soon, was very irresponsible and jumping the gun - at best, and at worst - was a very reverse-racist knee jerk reaction!' Clearly, they should have waited to find out more about George before making these accusation! Seems like in the minds of some, if a person is white, that also equals: RACIST! Which is absolutely false, I'm here to say!
Another thing, hard not to have noticed, was Trayvon's parents not having any problem standing with them all, giving the full impression that they were in total agreement with all of the 'racial accusations' being thrown at George Z...until we all heard the evidence that it was Trayvon who brought race into the situation first, by calling George a "creepy-white cracker!" Now, they have been back-peddling, and have made numerous statements that the case "has nothing to do with race!" Again, the assumed 'whitey' George, would be held fully accountable for all alleged 'racial profiling' but young Trayvon's 'sin'...even though proven, was fully pardoned and overlooked.
This might be a good place to also state what I'm seeing as obvious proof that Zimmerman had
not been 'racially profiling' and simply 'hunting Trayvon down' and wanting to shoot him, as has been suggested...because if that is what George had had on his mind, he wouldn't have been communicating with the police, as he was doing, and Trayvon would never have had the opportunity to get so close to George to have broken his nose, and then pin him to the ground. George would have shot him, long before either of these things had transpired. These are obvious observances to me.
This might be a good place to also state what I'm seeing as obvious proof that Zimmerman had
not been 'racially profiling' and simply 'hunting Trayvon down' and wanting to shoot him, as has been suggested...because if that is what George had had on his mind, he wouldn't have been communicating with the police, as he was doing, and Trayvon would never have had the opportunity to get so close to George to have broken his nose, and then pin him to the ground. George would have shot him, long before either of these things had transpired. These are obvious observances to me.
Not reporting black on white crime, in the same way that we report white on black crime...is a crime against all Americans in too many ways to go into in this blog. Fairer reporting would insist on and promote justice, accountability, and promote safer and healthier choices and actions from everyone! It would also discourage all crime, and soothe the feelings of racial injustices that are many times felt in the white race, as well. Up till now, this has obviously not been an important enough topic to discuss...I beg to differ, and I am not alone. The George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin case, has embolden many to begin discussing topics such as this. There has been fear of the media, and reporters to write articles about these occurrences in the past, I believe, they were concerned that it could 'cause' more white on black 'revenge crimes.' The reality is, all the movies about racism in America's past, played over and over, and any real or 'perceived' white on black 'racial crimes' have clearly caused heightened racial indignities in our black communities and could be the cause of 'revenge' type crimes against whites in America. Where is the concern about that? It can happen, and does either way, does that justify only reporting on one, and not on the other?
Why is this type of injustice happening? Look at the George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin incident...everyone was drooling at the opportunity to quicky categorize it as a 'hate crime' with a 'white man' viciously hunting down an innocent "Skiddles eating" black youth...as if eating Skiddles proves that you could never do anything wrong! Admittedly, it's been made pretty clear that Trayvon, was on his way home from having gone to a neighborhood store, and most likely had no nefarious activities planned, on that night, anyway. However, no one really has any proof that he was never involved in any mischief around there, or if he had in any way aided or abetted those who had broken into the homes there, in the past. We do know, though, according to the testimony of his very good friend...that he did have racist tendencies...and it has recently come out that he may have been planning to buy a gun, online. In a white youth all of the above would be scorned by all, and could ruin his reputation for sure...but racial slurs, planning to buy a gun, and very possibly a racist belief system, by Trayvon is minimized and forgotten. I just don't get it.
Should it be determined that George be sent to prison for life, for not having been a white racist, and for not having broken any laws? Certainly, not obeying a dispatcher is not against the law either? Would it actually make everyone feel better...or bring young Trayvon back? Or, would it actually cause a whole lot of other, even scarier concerns for Caucasian Americans everywhere, who may need to protect themselves at some point, if their attacker happens to end up being a black man? Granted, in this case, with George and Trayvon, we have two men, sorely misunderstanding the motives of the other, and travesty is the end result...but what about many other situations that may occur, in the coming days or years...across our land? Can my caucasian husband and son, protect themselves if attacked by an African American assailant? Will they be trusted, to have been able to determine correctly if their health or lives were in danger, enough to protect themselves with a gun, if need be? Or would they be assaulted with false accusations of 'racist' or have a bounty put out on their lives by The New Black Panther Party, or others who would do such a thing? Will all the liberal black leaders have a knee jerk reaction, and immediately come to the aid of the attacker, because he was black? Would they all and start yelling, "Crucify Him"...just because of the color of their skin being white? How can we not ask ourselves these questions after watching this happen before our very eyes?
I, for one, am not as confident after this case, that Lady Justice is still wearing a blindfold, and not seeing skin color. Isn't that what we all want? With all the shananigans that have taken place in trying to 'prove' the unfounded accusation that George, was 'white' (what a joke,) and that somehow this should prove that he was guilty of racially profiling Trayvon, has given us insight into just how insistent some will be in the belief that just because a person is white that there must be racism, in their actions and decisions. This is very disheartening to me.
As I've stated before, if either George or Trayvon had carried out their role differently, and made different decisions, we wouldn't even be talking, reporting, or blogging about it today...but, tragically, I can see other cases, down the road, where people will also have to make the soul wrenching decision to shoot and kill an attacker at some point. If George Zimmerman is found guilty and faces prison time - this will open up a whole new can of worms. Some will insist that Florida's law is too lenient and try to force it to be changed...while other states will choose to adopt a Florida-type law, to discourage attacks being perpetrated on any of their citizens. I believe, if George does go to prison...we will see more black on white attacks in the future because there will be less fear of our judicial system holding them accountable because of this case. Where's the justice in that?
ImJusSayin' there are many issues underlying and intertwined in this case; racial, political, emotional...and many across social media are discussing it on all these levels. Hopefully, however, this jury will allow the 'laws of Florida' to keep them on the high ground, and on the right path, and choose to make sure that 'justice' is doled out appropriately for George Zimmerman, and those who love him, as well. I realize that the deep sorrow that we all feel, associated with Mr. and Mrs. Martin's loss of their son, can pull you to feeling a misguided notion that his 'shooter' must be sent off to prison to make something right...but I believe, allowing emotions to rule this decision will actually negate true justice.
Did George Zimmermam 'break the law' in any of his decisions that led to Trayvon's death. This is the important question at hand. This is, as you know, the duty of those seated on this jury and what they must be guided by. However, you can never tell how a jury will decide...and so we wait...all of America, waiting...and praying for God's guidance, truth, and peace, to prevail in the hearts and minds of each jury member, and all those across our land, regardless of the outcome...
and let us pray, that cooler heads, will prevail...especially after we hear the verdict.
Did George Zimmermam 'break the law' in any of his decisions that led to Trayvon's death. This is the important question at hand. This is, as you know, the duty of those seated on this jury and what they must be guided by. However, you can never tell how a jury will decide...and so we wait...all of America, waiting...and praying for God's guidance, truth, and peace, to prevail in the hearts and minds of each jury member, and all those across our land, regardless of the outcome...
and let us pray, that cooler heads, will prevail...especially after we hear the verdict.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)